﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><copyright>Copyright 2003-2026 Bug &amp; dizzy.hr</copyright><ttl>30</ttl><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 03:07:41 GMT</pubDate><managingEditor>pisma@bug.hr</managingEditor><language>hr</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:25:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><description>Tema unutar podforuma Grafičke kartice</description><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/topic/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/29527.aspx</link><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
E sad si ga malo pretjero....</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445477.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:25:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b842a63a0bb220639d78165b36aed2bd</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
Nemislim na tvoj, nego na autora teme. Tvoj na 3,2 je slabiji od E8200 na defaultu.</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445269.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:47:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c4f60f56a0854cb850d89751cb59f34c</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>Ma sta kao athlon x2 4850....
clockana je na 2x3.2Ghz....to nije mala stvar..alo..heh...
ma mogu tu 9600GT jeftino nabavit...samo me zanima to sa "bugom"...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445267.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:44:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">546ec9f383311f0063adf742e951ba67</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
Ma sta ti pricas da je Crysis neoptimiziran, te zahtjeve opravdava grafika i ti nekoliko puta.</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445265.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:43:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">980158e58baa0ad55ad328d02d8187a0</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
9600gt je neznazno jača, bolje ti uzmi hd4890 i ta ti je prejaka za proc.
&amp;nbsp;
Evo ti ovisnost cpu-a o rezoluciji, grafa je gtx280 mislim -&amp;gt; http://www.guru3d.com/article/cpu-scaling-in-games...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445263.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:42:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">e4dbd0bda7ae1c5a912c941618697c02</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
Da DX10. S time da zadnju misiju odigraš na DX9 jer zašteka igra (Crysis). inače radio sam bench za Crysis i odvrtio je average frame rate 29, a sa zauzećem memorije od preko 960MB! cijelo vrijeme!!</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445248.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:33:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2bd1b5abdaa16e891b9a1807926f6a74</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>evo da ne otvaram novu temu....
imam E4600 clockan na 3.2GHz...4GB ram...HD3850....
jeli mi se isplati&amp;nbsp; uzimat Gainward 9600GT GS za 350 kn ili da potrosim sve pare na HD4890...
cuo sam da su ...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445247.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:33:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1f4e45d12e8ea99b4ca1376879586a71</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
gta 4 a naročito crysis kod mene ne dolaze u obzir, jednostavno su prezahtjevne pa se ne želim s
tim niti zezati....</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445229.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:23:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">154507239dbbd55097dd60a6fc735a8e</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>ako je na DX10 onda nije lose iako sam mislio da su bolji rezultati....
Ali rezultate u&amp;nbsp; crysisu i gta4 netreba gledati...jer su extra loše optimizirani...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445226.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:22:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2b3a59b97b16b3e3fbbabe6b5e118049</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>Ja mislim na rezoluciju 1680x1050 i sa AA+AF uključenim na x8, x6. Probao sam. Crysis radi na 25 frapsa, a Far Cry 2 na 30 samo...:(</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445225.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:20:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b70e18ddebd50d5dc493546e6bc80a62</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>Na kojoj rezoluciji??
Nemoguće je to sta kazes...bar za Far Cry 2...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445204.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:08:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">503f67e138ff49e5e3f7fe3485ac357f</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>GTA 4, Crysis i Far Cry 2 neće ići na very high sa tom grafom. Meni jedva izvuče 30 frapsa u tim igrama, a imam Core2Quad i HD4870!!</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445195.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:05:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">81fd310ee115ebd0fa617fb80a29745b</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>da...pogotovo na gta 4....njemu je i cetverojezgreni malo...heh....
ali grafa je dosta jaka pa fps ipak nece pasti ispod igrivog....
evo vidi usporedbu CPU vs GPU u crysisu</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445178.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:57:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c2ef86be39fc52cb2066850a69a4e320</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
Pa onda će moć,ali na malim rezama je procesor dota važan pa ti može bit usko grlo,pogotovo na gta iv(ako ga misli igrat)</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445172.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:54:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">dea7ffcaa37bd9c6d1464726de02c41e</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>rezolucija je ja mislim 1280x1024....
da budes siguran ...uzmi tu HD4850 i napajanje...i ako ti neka igra bude trzala na max postavkama
pitaj nas na forumu i mi cemo ti rec jel zbog procesora...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445167.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:51:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">39a899a045e75ad6cba425d806dc7d82</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
ja tu i tamo prebacim da vidim što pjeva, a dalje visim na forumu i tražim dobre savjete :)</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445162.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:49:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">66f9ab91de01a26ff9e2771075337266</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>Koja reza?</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445159.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:48:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">42b7dbdddb2b85431ecae4799658bb90</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>šteta što nema ove ekipe sa foruma...da vidimo njihovo mišljenje ...valjda slusaju thompsona na HRT2 ...hehe....
&amp;nbsp;</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445151.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:46:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">c6605711576e72012b23fe7971216c2d</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
ok, hvala na pomoći...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445146.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:43:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">88518283725fcad7add34303a67a319f</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>ma sve ce ti na high...vjeruj mi...uzmi tog chiefteca 450w....trebao bi biti dovoljan...
&amp;nbsp;</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445144.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:42:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">3d18cc9d2940f56bf0b6fec1e36a7db6</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
COD 4,5, Call of Juarez Bound in Blood, Prototype i takve, više novije (makar COD 4 i 5 nisu noviji...ipak...)</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445140.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:39:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">af4f6bbb2ccd8b707a7f56e646a20260</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>mislim da bi trebala sve na high...na koje igre konkretno ciljas?</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445136.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:36:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f595078883d664eb4a2743c296260066</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
meni je samo stvar u tome što sam se raspitao i kažu da mi grafička neće biti full iskoristiva, meni nije to najbitnije meni je samo bitno da će uz Chieftec-a 450w i taj proc koji imam 2x1.8ghz vrti...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445133.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:32:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">54c86a3241c4c3817565c71ec7cb147a</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>On dode oko 700kn ako se ne varam...
procesor ima 2MB L2 cache isto kao i tvoj samo veci takt....
ubrzanje neces osjetit u radu....a u igrama ce ti biti
razlika 3-4 fps..izmedu E4300 i E6300....
n...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445129.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:30:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">9beafee4d5b92435121ceeabe280cd35</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
ciljam na intel pentium E6300 2x2.8ghz l2 cache 2 mb socket 775</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445125.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:26:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">b40700d9c5bec252442c06853e602e68</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>steta baš....ali jednostavno ti se ne isplati davat jos 500-600kn za procesor
koji ima isto L2 cachea uz malo veci takt....govorim o E5xxx seriji...ako na nju ciljas</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445124.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:24:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">bda6f4588a147e2545f2f7ea328ca825</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
problem je što ja ne mogu clockati radi matične...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445120.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:21:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fbf9ab956af7c51fcb1c7b0e2554664e</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>Pričate gluposti....on gotovo pa netreba clockat proc....
lagano clockaj na 2x2.4GHz bez dizanja vcore-a i to je skroz dovoljno....
jel vi čitate bug ili samo prelistate....
&amp;nbsp;
ostavis ovaj sv...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445111.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:11:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">5b8b37f054383f1b38d19c1b07d08223</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
Za gta 4 nikad nije dosta( bar za dualca)</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445078.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:28:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">53c428581720dd76e1628740655d23a3</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
Dosta bi bilo 3,0-3,2 ghz da ju do kraja iskoristi!</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445076.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:25:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f17c3af2e2801b1ddc02ac63a934fac3</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
sve ok ali sam pronašao Chieftec 450W na oglasniku pa mi je jeftinije od ovog...zato sam tako zapeo za njega...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445072.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:20:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">8680cd3db85058a162c65ff7b398e793</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
Provjereno radi i na Fortronu 400.</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445069.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:19:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">f23bc919f6a82f2678405ba18489267e</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>a da li će chieftec 450W biti dobar za ovu: http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/sapphire_hd4850_dual/2.htm</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445062.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:15:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">2603d9c2196a03cb5b66465f3dd78d46</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
Neće ni to biti dosta, treba bar 3,0-3,6GHz da bi je do kraja iskoristio.
&amp;nbsp;
To će gurat i fortron 400W za 300kn bez problema, a chief 450w nije isplativ , bolje je uzet corsair cx400 bolji je...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445054.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:10:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">0c3016a1b8b2689d9debb861662760ff</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
ne mislim clockat, kupit ću Intel Pentium Dual-Core 2x2.8ghz, to će biti dovoljno za nju i Chieftec napajanje 450W</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445050.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:08:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">837095079522ec1013763e8a1aa7a1e8</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>Toxic ima povisene taktove i odlican hladnjak.Moja preporuka.</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445046.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:07:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">fefdc0f855d0480ed3d88025a1d5dfae</guid><category /></item><item><title>RE: Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>
Toxic bez razmišljanja, ali najjača je vapor-x sa gddr5 (takvih nema kod nas).
&amp;nbsp;
Ak nemisliš clockat procesor to onda nije grafa za tebe...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445044.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 18:04:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">1c5289252b12dc3ddefc91167ec15fde</guid><category /></item><item><title>Ati 4850 usporedba</title><description>koja je od ovih Ati-jevih najbolja: Powercolor Ati 4850 ddr4 512mb 256bit, Saphire Ati Radeon 4850, 512mb ddr3, 256 bit ili Saphire Ati Radeon 4850 Toxic 512mb, ddr3, 256bit
&amp;nbsp;
vidio sam da je T...</description><link>http://bugforum.azurewebsites.net/forum/post/graficke-kartice/ati-4850-usporedba/445026.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:56:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">6a1a86dcfdeb4f6a790634fe397a8b6c</guid><category /></item></channel></rss>